Sunday , August 20 2017

Why developers probably aren’t (and shouldn’t) be making Android Wear watch faces yet

Starwatch

Google’s Wayne Piekarski has taken to Google+ to talk about the state of custom watch-faces for Android Wear, and while he’s doubtlessly impressed with what developers have come up with since the launch of the Android Wear SDK, he’s cautioning not to go too far. Not yet.

As we know, and as Wayne has commented, customisability has allowed Android to thrive, and no doubt will have the same positive effect for Android Wear as well. However, the platform isn’t quite ready for the kind of extensibility people want in the form of watch faces.. yet.

Wayne explains:

Custom watch faces are activities running inside another process.

However, they have some special considerations due to interactions with the stream and always-on ambient mode–including using a shorter peek card, moving the status indicators for battery and mute, and rendering the faces differently in ambient mode.

Right now, without an official API, making a really great watch face currently takes a fair bit of tweaking.

In a nutshell, the watch faces that exist at the moment are kind of kludges; they work because developers have figured out ways to emulate the proper behaviour, but it’s not being done in a consistent fashion. This means potentially inconsistent experience for users, and at the more extreme end, watch faces that might not work as well as they should.

They’re working on this, of course. Wayne tells us that a number of changes will become available once Android Wear is migrated from a KitKat base to Android L later this year. At the moment, though, Wayne has this advice for would be watch face developers:

As we work on finalizing the API, we would suggest not posting your apps publicly to Google Play until there is a stable, published API (we’d suggest using Alpha or Beta channels, available through the Play Developer Console, in the meantime). These changes mentioned above are coming soon and will make it easier for you to create great watch faces, but the existing unpublished API may not be compatible with the next Android Wear release, and no one wants to disrupt the experience for users in the future.

 
Source: +WaynePiekarski.

Chris Rowland   Editor and Publisher

Join the Ausdroid Conversation

4 Comments on "Why developers probably aren’t (and shouldn’t) be making Android Wear watch faces yet"

avatar
Sort by:   newest | oldest | most voted
Member

Could we please have a PSA not to have keyboards on watches either?

Jasonc07
Valued Guest
Jasonc07

I don’t know why so many people have such a strong opinion about this.. If you don’t want a keyboard don’t download one.

Christopher
Valued Guest
Christopher

I just want to someone to port the LG watch faces to my Gear Live and that’ll tide me over for now.

Stephen Crisafulli
Valued Guest
Stephen Crisafulli

WTF, they release a watch with super ugly and lame watchfaces then tell everyone they shouldn’t add there own till “Google” is good and ready.

wpDiscuz

Check Also

Leaked images suggest the Kirin 970-powered Huawei Mate 10 will include an under-display fingerprint sensor

Huawei have signalled their intention to focus on the mid-range and high end devices in …