Well this comes as no surprise as we’ve been onto this since the start, but Telstra has now made it official.

They will be releasing the HTC Wildfire in August, although no pricing has been announced, Telstra have stated that pricing will be “aggressive” just like it was with the HTC Desire, and that it will be priced lower than the Desire. Well, we bloody hope so. Telstra are pretty much marketing it as the Desire, but smaller & more social network oriented.

The HTC Wildfire is a direct opponent to both the SE X10 Mini & X10 Mini Pro, even though Telstra are launching the X10 Mini Pro in August as well. Seems like small devices are all the rage.

Source: Telstra Exchange.
11 Comments
newest
oldest most voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Nathan
Nathan
10 years ago

The screen is lower res than my old iPhone 3G (from 2 years ago), and perhaps more importantly has a slow CPU.

As much as I love Android, its not well enough optimized to run nicely on slow CPUs so I cant imagine anyone enjoying this phone.

Cooper
Cooper
Reply to  Buzz Moody
10 years ago

Does anyone know what price this will be when launched?

your review on LG optimus sounds like a better package on a $19 cap in terms of base hardware?

HVGA vs QVGA
600Mhz vs 528Mhz

Depends on pricing for each?

spoco2
spoco2
10 years ago

Geeze, calling it awful is a huge stretch. Come on, it’s still a nicely made, well specced mid range phone. I would get one if it just bumped the screen res up a bit. As it stands it’ll fill many people’s needs. Awful… man, some people need to think about what OTHER people may want from a phone rather than just what they do.

Marné Prinsloo
Reply to  spoco2
10 years ago

It can’t be called as mid-spec if the resolution itself is well below the first Android phone that was released 2 years ago (G1). Even then, the first iPhone already had 480×320 back then.

This is supposed to be budget/low-spec.

I mean, I would understand if X10 Mini had to use 320×240 due to its small screen. But for a 3.2″, 320×240 will look as ugly as my iPaq that I bought in the early 2000’s.

Nathan
Nathan
10 years ago

Yeh, this phone is awful really.. it would have to be extremely cheap to even be worth considering.

spoco2
spoco2
10 years ago

If it weren’t for that low, low resolution of 320×240 I’d want this phone… 480×320 is as low as you’d want to go I think.

Spik3balloon
Spik3balloon
Reply to  spoco2
10 years ago

Exactly. On a 3.2″ screen, it makes no sense why they would drop the resolution to QVGA. You might as well buy a Magic.

Dave
Dave
10 years ago

Is this going to be an exclusive?