Sunday , October 22 2017

Google Pixel sample shots look tantilising when taken by a professional photographer

pixel-colours
Google’s Pixel phones are taking a stab at the higher end of the market, with Google spruiking the camera performance of the phones as a major selling point at the launch event. But just how good is the camera? Well, if the photo samples that a Google Product Manager just shared are any guide, it’s pretty good.

Any photo samples shared by a company should of course be taken with a grain of salt, but these samples look fantastic. There’s a full album shared on Google Photos, but a sampling looks like this:

The pics look good, but it’s going to be real world samples we want to see once the phones get into the hands of reviewers and the general public. We’re hoping to get some extended time with a Pixel soon.

 
Source: Google Photos.
Via: Android Central.

Daniel Tyson   Editor

Dan is a die-hard Android fan. Some might even call him a lunatic. He's been an Android user since Android was a thing, and if there's a phone that's run Android, chances are he owns it (his Nexus collection is second-to-none) or has used it.

Dan's dedication to Ausdroid is without question, and he has represented us at some of the biggest international events in our industry including Google I/O, Mobile World Congress, CES and IFA.

Join the Ausdroid Conversation

7 Comments on "Google Pixel sample shots look tantilising when taken by a professional photographer"

avatar
Sort by:   newest | oldest | most voted
Hieu Nguyen
Valued Guest
Hieu Nguyen

Okay so now let’s see some video examples to see how it performs with the lack of hardware image stabilization

Nizar Noor
Valued Guest

EIS can be as good, or even better, than OIS. For example: Look at Sony Xperia XZ or Hyperlapse by Instagram. Based on the presentation, looks like Pixel phones are using the same approach on video stabilisation as Hyperlapse, which sounds great. We’ll see.

Jesus Machine
Valued Guest
Jesus Machine

The meta data shows evidence of Adobe Lightroom processing and Snapseesd according to other Android sites.

Andrew
Valued Guest
Andrew

Not all shots have been processed, and I’d be hard pressed to be able to definitively say which ones have been processed and which haven’t, which just goes to show at how great the camera seems to be.

Member
Luke Vesty

In half the shots. Not all.

Here’s the thing. Everyone uses post processing. Whether it’s Lightroom, snapseed, VSCO, Instagram, or whatever. Photo apps are enormously popular. But regardless, you need a high end camera to achieve high quality images even via post production. If you don’t have a solid starting point your images will still suck even after editing.

Kendozaaa
Valued Guest
Kendozaaa

Yes, but when you state #nofilter, it’s a little misleading to post-process, right?

Member
Luke Vesty

Not necessarily. A filter is often a one step “make picture overly saturated, overly contrasty, and overly faded”. It’s the sort of thing amateurs and non-photography enthusiasts do to make their pictures look “better”. Sure, it’s technically a form of post processing. But when I think of post processing I think of a more deliberate and considered approach involving subtle tweaks and adjustments rather than a blanket overhaul.

But I do see your point.

The question, though, is whether this camera is any good with or without post processing. Post often makes good photos great. It doesn’t make crappy photos great.

wpDiscuz

Check Also

Want to remap the active edge / squeeze gesture on the Pixel 2 range? You can.

One of my favourite features in the new Pixel 2 range is the Active Edge …