So the Google phones for 2016 have launched – the 5” Pixel and the 5.5” Pixel XL, so far so good. They’re getting great reviews generally speaking, they’re even impressing some of the hardest-to-please reviewers. I think we’d all be disappointed if a phone retailing for over $1400 turned out to be generally not impressive, but for that price, it had better be able to cook a lamb roast and fetch me a coffee in the morning, right?
The cost aside, what a lot of users and reviewers alike seem to be doing at the moment is focusing on the phones themselves, and not really turning their minds to how important the Pixel phones are to Android and Google more generally.
The evolution of the Nexus phone line was without a doubt the starting point for where we are today. They were a “stock” Android experience and didn’t have the frills and invasive software that many of the manufacturers include on their devices such as Sense on the HTC flagship devices, Touchwiz on Samsung and Emotion UI on Huawei to name only a few.
Unlike iPhone, which has both its software and hardware controlled by just one entity, Android doesn’t quite work that way; Android is a platform which manufacturers can adopt and modify, resulting in many different hardware manufacturers all with phones that run (or are based on) Android. The danger for Google in this, though, is that their name gets lost amongst the others; many average users don’t identify their phone as an Android, they say “I’ve got a Samsung” or somewhat less frequently “I’ve got the Nexus 6P”.
This is fine, in the sense that Android is in the hands of millions of smartphone users around the world. It’s good for Android. It’s less good for Google which has — until now — largely taken a backseat to the branding efforts and rewards reaped by hardware manufacturers. When you look at the fancy launch events for premium Android phones, Android itself rates barely a mention, and Google is often not mentioned at all.
Enter the Pixel phone
The Pixel line of Android phones represent the most important devices that Google have released. Sure, Google have released other products before, and they’ve even (somewhat) co-branded the previous Nexus devices, but it isn’t the same. Excepting Chromecast devices, virtually every product that’s come before the Pixel line has been something else first, and Google second.
With the Pixel line, these are not Android phones. They are Google phones, that run Android.
This time around rather that giving the OEM a guiding hand with design, Google have BEEN the designers and HTC have delivered what Google asked for. While the manufacturing arm isn’t directly a part of Google (yet…) this brings the Pixel phone into the same arena as Apple’s iPhone (recently iPhones) where the phone has been designed with the best user experience for the OS kept at the forefront of thought during design and it shows, to be direct about it.
This is the first time Google have directly taken on Apple with hardware design as well as the operating system. The comparison of the devices is remarkable:
Google Pixel XL | Apple iPhone 7 Plus | Google Pixel | Apple iPhone 7 | Release date | October 2016 | September 2016 | October 2016 | September 2016 | Screen size | 5.5-inch | 5.5-inch | 5.0-inch | 4.7-inch | Screen technology | AMOLED | LCD | AMOLED | LCD | Resolution | 2,560 x 1,440 | 1,920 x 1,080 | 1,920 x 1,080 | 1,334 x 750 | PPI | 534 | 401 | 441 | 326 | Rear camera | 12.3MP | 12MP | 12.3mp | 12MP | Rear aperture | f/2.0 | f/1.8 | f/2.0 | f/1.8 | Front camera | 8MP | 7MP | 8MP | 7MP | Front aperture | f/2.4 | f/2.2 | f/2.4 | f/2.2 | Chipset | Snapdragon 821 | A10 Fusion Chip | Snapdragon 821 | A10 Fusion Chip | Core config | 2.15GHz x 2 + 1.6GHz x 2 | Quad Core 2.33GHz | 2.15GHz x 2 + 1.6GHz x 2 | Quad Core | Ram | 4GB | 3GB | 4GB | 2GB | Storage |
|
|
|
| MicroSD | No | No | No | No | Battery | 3,450 mAh | 2,900 mAh | 2,770 mAh | 1,960 mAh | Battery removable | — | — | — | — | Connector | USB C | Lightning | USB C | Lightning | Headphone Port | Yes | — | Yes | — | Headphone Location | Top | — | Top | — | Speaker Configuration | Bottom | — | Bottom | — | WIFI standards | 802.11 a/b/g/n | 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac | 802.11 a/b/g/n | 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac | Bluetooth standards |
|
|
|
| NFC | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Location |
|
|
|
| Android OS | Android 7.1 | iOS 10 | Android 7.1 | iOS 10 | Vendor skin | — | — | — | — | Dimensions | 154.72x75.74x 7.31(Bottom) 8.58(Top) mm | 158.2 x 77.9 x 7.3 mm | 143.84x69.54x 7.31(Bottom) 8.58(Top) mm | 138.3 x 67.1 x 7.1 mm | Weight | 168g | 188g | 143g | 138g | Colours |
|
|
|
|
---|
When you look at the Pixel phones in this context, it starts to become clearer why the Pixel phone is getting so much attention even with the $1419 price tag for the XL. The war is on and the battle is hot.
Not only is it the hardware that Google have pushed forward to compete with Apple and the iPhone but they’re now pushing ahead with advertising in a more active way than previously with the Nexus phones. There was the normal, organic hype around the new Google device that is created by those who are faithful to the Android brand and sites like ours. What was new and very pleasing to see with the Pixel launch is the active generation by Google through paid advertising and social media.
The “made by Google” event was the start of what has been the most concentrated advertising campaign drive by Google on their mobile devices. They have released multiple adverts released for TV (available for viewing on YouTube) as well as radio advertising to ensure that the market placement of the Pixel devices is more mainstream and less “that’s for geeks” thank was often recognised as the case with Nexus devices.
Pushing hard into the market within Australia will always require a carrier partnership, a premium phone needs to be partnered with a premium carrier and the leader of the pack in Australia is Telstra. This is clearly a starting point for the Pixel devices but it wouldn’t surprise me at all to see other carriers; namely Vodafone and/or Optus making a play for them next time around if they hold a high level of customer satisfaction and perhaps more importantly (for the carriers at least) put in a strong sales showing.
How have they gone so far?
While we’re aware that iPhones usually sell out across the board on the first day of retail availability, it’s a bit much to expect Google’s Pixels to do the same, especially when they don’t have that established history in the market. However, we understand from a number of sources within Telstra’s retail network and within JB Hi-Fi that a number of stores sold out of Pixel handsets on the first day, and re-supplied stock has moved steadily as well. This does vary somewhat by neighbourhood; the significant price of these phones, combined with the lack of established market history, does mean that those with lesser disposable income are holding back from buying … at least, just for now.
At the end of the day, there will always be loyal fans of both operating systems, both sides have their advantages. The Pixel devices are the latest and greatest, running the latest and most user friendly version of Android. It’s the first real market drive from Google to put their vision of an Android phone to market which brings them alongside Apple in the market where they control not only the OS but the hardware as well. In my short time with the Pixel XL to date I honestly believe that despite the price tag that the Pixel phones have the potential to be among, if not THE best smartphones of 2016 which is why I believe that the Pixels are far more important than people have realised yet.
I see the outright price as semi irrelevant..however the fact these are only on telstra is a major downer. I don’t mind a slight premium on price, but telstra is much more expensive, for much less data and international minutes. It doesn’t matter how fast the network is if you don’t have enough data to use your phone! I’m struggling with 7gb of data from Vodafone (which works well for me) but with telstra I’d need to provide my house keys and first born child to get that much. Rant over 🙂
I agree that the Telstra exclusivity is disappointing for many people. But I think Google is just getting started. I’d be betting on the Pixel 2 coming to multiple carriers.
I don’t see Telstra as being expensive for the Pixel. For $54 per month you get 10GB of data, unlimited everything, unlimited calls and texts to New Zealand, USA, Hong Kong, Malaysia, Singapore, United Kingdom, Canada, India, China and South Korea. You also get an interest free loan of $1079 to pay for your Pixel, with monthly repayments of $45. All of this on what is without question Australia’s best and fastest network. If you were to buy a Pixel outright and then grab a monthly plan: Vaya is $56 per month for a similar plan (without the overseas calling),… Read more »
I suppose when you break it down that way, it doesn’t sound so bad, thanks for the info. Maybe it’s a psychological barrier paying 100 bucks for the phone a month..I’m assuming that is the regular pixel? I’m thinking of the s7 edge, as I can get that around 90 bucks a month on Vodafone… Plus perhaps a discount of 10 percent since it’s the second connection on my account. I think it’s probably that in my mind 80 bucks a month odd is plenty to pay for a phone ( and I would think that the edge is more… Read more »
Hi Taleim!
Yeah, I think that $100 a month is a lot, I was just pointing out that it appears to be the going rate at the moment. Phones are becoming very expensive now 🙁
I hope they provide 3 years of updates now with that price and the hardware control, I’m sick of my android phones getting neglected after a year or so, I often buy a 1 year old phone to get the reduced price. Apple seem to provide at least 3 years of well performing latest updates these days.
It’s a guaranteed 2 years OS updates, 3 years of security updates.
Once Google starts designing its own chips this number will likely grow for future Pixels.
It would be nice to see it grow. Especially when you don’t buy the phones day one. $1400 every two years is too much for a phone for me, that’s much higher than what I spend on my gaming PC.
I think it’ll be difficult for the first Pixel given Google is dependent on Qualcomm for support. Once Google starts designing its own chips, which is surely on the cards, support for future devices should be longer.
It’s a shame there is no visual voicemail support for Telstra though.
Had a quick play of the Pixels at Telstra at Runaway Bay Gold Coast and I have to say I LOVED the way you could launch the camera from the On/Off button with a quick double push… and it launched FAST. Shot to shot was incredibly quick. My wife has a Nexus 6P which I was impressed with, however these Pixel’s are a level way above the 6P. Add in unlimited upload of uncompressed photos and videos and this makes it a very compelling device. It may not be waterproof but it has enough water resistance for me, it may… Read more »
Up to 7 hours in 15 minutes. Not 70% in 15 minutes.
But coming from someone who now owns a Pixel I can confirm charging is very, very fast.
fyi: Launching the camera from double tap on/off is not new. I’ve had it on my stock Nexus 6 for years. However, yes, it takes about 2 seconds to open on the N6, while the Pixel looks to be almost instant.
> The Google Pixel phones are more important than people realise
Google want to hope not, compared to the competition, they don’t really measure up. Most would prefer either the S7 Edge or the LG V20 – and would end up paying less too.
See this is what people still don’t seem to understand. The Pixel is a mainstream device. The specs are important but not the selling point. The priority is user experience. Ask the average consumer why RAM is helpful, or what the difference between FHD and UHD is, or what the pros and cons of expandable and cloud storage is and they’ll shrug their shoulders. “Does it take good photos?” “Does Facebook work well?” “Is it cool?” “Can I use WhatsApp to message my daughter while she’s overseas?” These are the sorts of questions average people ask when purchasing a phone.… Read more »
This is the kind of comment I love to see on Ausdroid.
Here, here!
🙂
Well much appreciated!
Chris already said it – but this is awesome
You’ve taken onboard what has been said, responded to some points and clearly have your own well thought through opinion that you’re sharing.
Thank you
Thanks Phil. I probably have far too much time on my hands!
Got to say I disagree (but you expected that didn’t you?) Since you’ve detailed your thoughts, here’s mine on why I think you are wrong. First, I didn’t mention specs. Place a Pixel next to an S7 Edge and put a punter in front of them – which gets bought? It’s the Edge isn’t it, because it looks like a much nicer phone and the shop price is the same. As far as the UI goes, I’d say Samsung have it better, google are terrible for making a coherent system and 7.1 feels like a ‘work in progress’ towards integrating… Read more »
I guess we’ll have to respectfully agree to disagree! We’ll see where the Pixel and the Galaxy S line is positioned in a few years time.
Whispy you’ve nailed it, my last Android phone was a HTC (cant recall the model) back in 2011, for me the user experience and lack of support was so bad I haven’t bought one since (I got better support with the Winblows phone I had prior). I’ve had 3 iPhones since and all have been exceptionally well supported and had high resell values as a result, making my next upgrade so much more affordable. The Pixel is the 1st Android phone I’ve considered buying in the years since, not because of the HW specifically but because it’s finally a fully… Read more »
Google may not win the ‘spec’ users, but my partner and I just upgraded from Note 4 to the pixels and without a doubt are extremely happy with our purchases. Blitzing fast, very good battery, great camera. It is just an incredibly smooth experience with these phones.
Before iPhone 7 was waterproof, why were people paying so much for iPhones that were so expensive compared to Android, without micro SD, low resolution screens, no removable batteries etc? Because of the user experience.
The Pixel (XL for us) have nailed that.